Matter of Spalding

Court of Appeals of Maryland

State v. Norton

117 A.3d 1055 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2015)

In Re Nicole B.

976 A.2d 1039 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2009)

In Re John P.

537 A.2d 263 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1988)

Johnson v. Solomon

484 F. Supp. 278 (D. Maryland, 1979)

Smith v. State

388 A.2d 539 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1978)

Parojinog v. State

384 A.2d 86 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1978)

Burton v. State

363 A.2d 243 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1976)

State Ex Rel Juv. Dept. of Multnomah Cty. v. K

554 P.2d 180 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1976)

State v. Kyseth

240 N.W.2d 671 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1976)

Williams & Fulwood v. Director, Patuxent Institution

347 A.2d 179 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1975)

Matter of Spalding

332 A.2d 246 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1975)

Miranda v. Arizona

384 U.S. 436 (Supreme Court, 1966)

In Re GAULT

387 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1967)

In Re WINSHIP

397 U.S. 358 (Supreme Court, 1970)

McKeiver v. Pennsylvania

403 U.S. 528 (Supreme Court, 1971)

Ivan v. v. City of New York

407 U.S. 203 (Supreme Court, 1972)

Richard M. v. Superior Court

482 P.2d 664 (California Supreme Court, 1971)

State v. Henderson

199 N.W.2d 111 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1972)

In Interest of EP

291 So. 2d 238 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)

Matter of Carter

318 A.2d 269 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1974)

Matter of Spalding

332 A.2d 246 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1975)

Jerry D. v. County of Stanislaus

23 Cal. App. 3d 1045 (California Court of Appeal, 1972)

Kirkpatrick v. Donnie H.

5 Cal. App. 3d 781 (California Court of Appeal, 1970)

Grier v. Daniel R.

274 Cal. App. 2d 749 (California Court of Appeal, 1969)

Rambeau v. Rambeau

266 Cal. App. 2d 1 (California Court of Appeal, 1968)

Holmes' Appeal

109 A.2d 523 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1954)

In Re Pereira

306 A.2d 821 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1973)

Greer v. Morrison

385 U.S. 807 (Supreme Court, 1966)

State v. Norton

Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2015

“it is clear that labels are not controlling in determining the applicability of the Due Process Clause to juvenile proceedings”

State v. Norton

Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2015

"it is clear that labels are not controlling in determining the applicability of the Due Process Clause to juvenile proceedings”

In Re Nicole B.

Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2009

noting that "labels are not controlling in determining the applicability of the Due Process Clause to juvenile proceedings"

In Re Nicole B.

Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2009

noting that “labels are not controlling in determining the applicability of the Due Process Clause to juvenile proceedings”

In Re Nicole B.

Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2009

“[I]t is clear that labels are not controlling in determining the applicability of’ a constitutional provision

In Re Nicole B.

Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2009

"[I]t is clear that labels are not controlling in determining the applicability of" a constitutional provision

Matter of Spalding

Opinions

Related