Matter of Sidney W.B. (Petraglia--Rosenberg)

133 A.D.3d 596, 18 N.Y.S.3d 560
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 4, 2015
Docket2013-10338
StatusPublished

This text of 133 A.D.3d 596 (Matter of Sidney W.B. (Petraglia--Rosenberg)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Sidney W.B. (Petraglia--Rosenberg), 133 A.D.3d 596, 18 N.Y.S.3d 560 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 81 to appoint a guardian of the person and property of Sidney W.B., an alleged incapacitated person, Samara Rosenberg appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Phelan, J.), dated August 19, 2013, as granted the application of Peter Kelly for an award of an attorney’s fee for legal services rendered as attorney for the objectant Geraldine B. to the extent of awarding him the sum of $52,635.

Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the notice of appeal from the order is deemed to be an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted (see CPLR 5701 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the application of Peter Kelly for an award of an attorney’s fee is denied.

Article 81 of the Mental Hygiene Law does not authorize an award of an attorney’s fee for services rendered in opposing a petition for the appointment of a guardian for the person and property of an alleged incapacitated person (see Matter of Ruth Q., 23 AD3d 479, 479 [2005]; cf. Mental Hygiene Law §§ 81.09 [f]; 81.10 [f]; 81.16 [f]; 81.23 [a] [1]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court erred in awarding an attorney’s fee to Peter Kelly for legal services rendered as attorney for Geraldine B., who opposed the petition. Mastro, J.P., Balkin, Dickerson and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Ruth Q.
23 A.D.3d 479 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 A.D.3d 596, 18 N.Y.S.3d 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-sidney-wb-petraglia-rosenberg-nyappdiv-2015.