In re Ruth Q.

23 A.D.3d 479, 808 N.Y.S.2d 110
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 14, 2005
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 23 A.D.3d 479 (In re Ruth Q.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Ruth Q., 23 A.D.3d 479, 808 N.Y.S.2d 110 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

In two related proceedings pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 81 to appoint legal guardians for the persons and property of Ruth Q. and Hyman Q., respectively, alleged incapacitated persons, Judith B. appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of two orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Taylor, J.), dated January 23, 2004, and February 11, 2004, respectively, as, in effect, denied her application for an award of an attorney’s fee.

Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the notices of appeal are treated as applications for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted (see CPLR 5701 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the orders are affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the petitioner-respondent, payable by the appellant.

The denial, in effect, of the appellant’s application for an award of an attorney’s fee was proper. Mental Hygiene Law article 81 does not authorize an award of an attorney’s fee for services rendered in opposing a petition for the appointment of a guardian for the person and property of alleged incapacitated persons (cf. Mental Hygiene Law § 81,16 [f]). Crane, J.P., Santucci, Mastro and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Sidney W.B. (Petraglia--Rosenberg)
133 A.D.3d 596 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
In re John T.
42 A.D.3d 459 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 A.D.3d 479, 808 N.Y.S.2d 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ruth-q-nyappdiv-2005.