Matter of Sheridan v. . P.J. Groll Construction Company
This text of 112 N.E. 568 (Matter of Sheridan v. . P.J. Groll Construction Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is no substantial difference between this case and the Wilson case, decided herewith. The claimant herein was in the service of a corporation engaged in the business of owning and operating apartment houses. This business is not' a hazardous employment under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, and the order of the Appellate Division herein should be reversed, with costs, and the claim dismissed upon the opinion in Matter of Wilson v. Dorflinger & Sons (218 N. Y. 84).
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Oh. J., Hiscooic, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, Seabury and Pound, JJ.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 N.E. 568, 218 N.Y. 633, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-sheridan-v-pj-groll-construction-company-ny-1916.