MATTER OF ROTH v. Cuevas

624 N.E.2d 689, 82 N.Y.2d 791, 604 N.Y.S.2d 551

New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 19, 1993·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

82 N.Y.2d 791 (1993) 624 N.E.2d 689 604 N.Y.S.2d 551

In the Matter of Allen H. Roth, Individually and on Behalf of All Signers of a Petition Filed Pursuant to Section 37 of the Municipal Home Rule Law, and as Secretary of New Yorkers for Term Limits, Inc., Respondent,
v.
Carlos Cuevas, as City Clerk of the City of New York, et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued October 14, 1993. Decided October 19, 1993.

O. Peter Sherwood, Corporation Counsel of New York City (Linda H. Young, Jonathan Pines and Pamela Seider Dolgow of counsel), for appellants.

Townley & Updike, New York City (Douglas C. Fairhurst, Steven I. Himelstein and Zvi N. Raskin of counsel), for respondent.

Charles S. Turner, County Attorney of Monroe County, Rochester (Raymond J. Lum of counsel), for County of Monroe, amicus curiae.

Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., BELLACOSA, SMITH and LEVINE.

Order affirmed, without costs, for reasons stated in the *794 opinion by Justice Martin Evans at Supreme Court (158 Misc 2d 238).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

82 N.Y.2d 791 (1993) 624 N.E.2d 689 604 N.Y.S.2d 551

In the Matter of Allen H. Roth, Individually and on Behalf of All Signers of a Petition Filed Pursuant to Section 37 of the Municipal Home Rule Law, and as Secretary of New Yorkers for Term Limits, Inc., Respondent,
v.
Carlos Cuevas, as City Clerk of the City of New York, et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued October 14, 1993. Decided October 19, 1993.

O. Peter Sherwood, Corporation Counsel of New York City (Linda H. Young, Jonathan Pines and Pamela Seider Dolgow of counsel), for appellants.

Townley & Updike, New York City (Douglas C. Fairhurst, Steven I. Himelstein and Zvi N. Raskin of counsel), for respondent.

Charles S. Turner, County Attorney of Monroe County, Rochester (Raymond J. Lum of counsel), for County of Monroe, amicus curiae.

Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., BELLACOSA, SMITH and LEVINE.

Order affirmed, without costs, for reasons stated in the *794 opinion by Justice Martin Evans at Supreme Court (158 Misc 2d 238).

MATTER OF ROTH v. Cuevas, 624 N.E.2d 689, 82 N.Y.2d 791, 604 N.Y.S.2d 551 (N.Y. 1993).

Pincite

624 N.E.2d 689 (MATTER OF ROTH v. Cuevas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoerger v. Spota

109 A.D.3d 564 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Molinari v. Bloomberg

596 F. Supp. 2d 546 (E.D. New York, 2009)

Dear v. Board of Elections

307 A.D.2d 1006 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Holbrook v. Rockland County

260 A.D.2d 437 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Schrader v. Cuevas

179 Misc. 2d 11 (New York Supreme Court, 1998)