MATTER OF ROTH v. Cuevas

New York Court of Appeals

MATTER OF ROTH v. Cuevas

624 N.E.2d 689, 82 N.Y.2d 791, 604 N.Y.S.2d 551

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 19, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 624 N.E.2d 689 (MATTER OF ROTH v. Cuevas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MATTER OF ROTH v. Cuevas, 624 N.E.2d 689, 82 N.Y.2d 791, 604 N.Y.S.2d 551 (N.Y. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

82 N.Y.2d 791 (1993) 624 N.E.2d 689 604 N.Y.S.2d 551

In the Matter of Allen H. Roth, Individually and on Behalf of All Signers of a Petition Filed Pursuant to Section 37 of the Municipal Home Rule Law, and as Secretary of New Yorkers for Term Limits, Inc., Respondent,
v.
Carlos Cuevas, as City Clerk of the City of New York, et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued October 14, 1993. Decided October 19, 1993.

O. Peter Sherwood, Corporation Counsel of New York City (Linda H. Young, Jonathan Pines and Pamela Seider Dolgow of counsel), for appellants.

Townley & Updike, New York City (Douglas C. Fairhurst, Steven I. Himelstein and Zvi N. Raskin of counsel), for respondent.

Charles S. Turner, County Attorney of Monroe County, Rochester (Raymond J. Lum of counsel), for County of Monroe, amicus curiae.

Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., BELLACOSA, SMITH and LEVINE.

Order affirmed, without costs, for reasons stated in the *794 opinion by Justice Martin Evans at Supreme Court (158 Misc 2d 238).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

82 N.Y.2d 791 (1993) 624 N.E.2d 689 604 N.Y.S.2d 551

In the Matter of Allen H. Roth, Individually and on Behalf of All Signers of a Petition Filed Pursuant to Section 37 of the Municipal Home Rule Law, and as Secretary of New Yorkers for Term Limits, Inc., Respondent,
v.
Carlos Cuevas, as City Clerk of the City of New York, et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued October 14, 1993. Decided October 19, 1993.

O. Peter Sherwood, Corporation Counsel of New York City (Linda H. Young, Jonathan Pines and Pamela Seider Dolgow of counsel), for appellants.

Townley & Updike, New York City (Douglas C. Fairhurst, Steven I. Himelstein and Zvi N. Raskin of counsel), for respondent.

Charles S. Turner, County Attorney of Monroe County, Rochester (Raymond J. Lum of counsel), for County of Monroe, amicus curiae.

Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., BELLACOSA, SMITH and LEVINE.

Order affirmed, without costs, for reasons stated in the *794 opinion by Justice Martin Evans at Supreme Court (158 Misc 2d 238).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

624 N.E.2d 689, 82 N.Y.2d 791, 604 N.Y.S.2d 551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-roth-v-cuevas-ny-1993.

Opinion

In the Matter of Allen H. Roth, Individually and on Behalf of All Signers of a Petition Filed Pursuant to Section 37 of the Municipal Home Rule Law, and as Secretary of New Yorkers for Term Limits, Inc., Respondent, v. Carlos Cuevas, as City Clerk of the City of New York, et al., Appellants.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

In the Matter of Allen H. Roth, Individually and on Behalf of All Signers of a Petition Filed Pursuant to Section 37 of the Municipal Home Rule Law, and as Secretary of New Yorkers for Term Limits, Inc., Respondent,
v.
Carlos Cuevas, as City Clerk of the City of New York, et al., Appellants.