Matter of Rendino v. . Continental Can Company
123 N.E. 886, 226 N.Y. 565, 1919 N.Y. LEXIS 913
Opinion
Order of Appellate Division and determination of industrial commission reversed and claim dismissed, with costs against the industrial commission in this court and in the Appellate Division., on ground there is no evidence to sustain the finding that the claimant’s injury arose out of the course of his employment, within the authority of Di Salvio v. Menihan Co. (225 N. Y. 123).
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Rendino v. . Continental Can Company, 123 N.E. 886, 226 N.Y. 565, 1919 N.Y. LEXIS 913 (N.Y. 1919).
123 N.E. 886 (Matter of Rendino v. . Continental Can Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claim of Merchant v. Pinkerton's Inc.
407 N.E.2d 443 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Erdberg v. United Textile Print Works
216 A.D. 574 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)
Claim of Hamberg v. Flower City Specialty Co.
202 A.D. 113 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)
Claim of Pientka v. Thompson Norris Co.
196 A.D. 911 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1921)
Claim of Yodakis v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co.
193 A.D. 150 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920)