Claim of Pientka v. Thompson Norris Co.
196 A.D. 911
Opinion
Award reversed and claim dismissed, on the authority of Matter of Rendino v. Continental Can Co. (226 N. Y. 565) and Yodakis v. Smith & Sons Carpet Co. (193 App. Div. 150; affd., 230 N. Y. 593). All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Pientka v. Thompson Norris Co., 196 A.D. 911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1921).
196 A.D. 911 (Claim of Pientka v. Thompson Norris Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Yodakis v. . Alexander Smith Sons Carpet Co.
130 N.E. 907 (New York Court of Appeals, 1921)
Matter of Rendino v. . Continental Can Company
123 N.E. 886 (New York Court of Appeals, 1919)
Claim of Yodakis v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co.
193 A.D. 150 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920)