Claim of Pientka v. Thompson Norris Co.
196 A.D. 911
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1921
StatusPublished
This text of 196 A.D. 911 (Claim of Pientka v. Thompson Norris Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Claim of Pientka v. Thompson Norris Co., 196 A.D. 911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1921).
Opinion
Award reversed and claim dismissed, on the authority of Matter of Rendino v. Continental Can Co. (226 N. Y. 565) and Yodakis v. Smith & Sons Carpet Co. (193 App. Div. 150; affd., 230 N. Y. 593). All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Matter of Yodakis v. . Alexander Smith Sons Carpet Co.
130 N.E. 907 (New York Court of Appeals, 1921)
Matter of Rendino v. . Continental Can Company
123 N.E. 886 (New York Court of Appeals, 1919)
Claim of Yodakis v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co.
193 A.D. 150 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
196 A.D. 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-pientka-v-thompson-norris-co-nyappdiv-1921.