MATTER OF QUINN v. Tutunjian
460 N.E.2d 1106, 61 N.Y.2d 730, 472 N.Y.S.2d 621, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4026
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, without costs. We agree with the Appellate Division that the mark was not in the voting square as required by section 9-112 of the Election Law.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Kaye. Taking no part: Judge Simons.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
MATTER OF QUINN v. Tutunjian, 460 N.E.2d 1106, 61 N.Y.2d 730, 472 N.Y.S.2d 621, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4026 (N.Y. 1984).
460 N.E.2d 1106 (MATTER OF QUINN v. Tutunjian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mondello v. Nassau County Board of Elections
6 A.D.3d 18 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Morphy v. Wade
208 A.D.2d 1039 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Scanlon v. Savago
160 A.D.2d 1162 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Minick v. Scranton
145 Misc. 2d 1006 (New York Supreme Court, 1989)
Williams v. Rensselaer County Board of Elections
118 A.D.2d 966 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)