MATTER OF QUINN v. Tutunjian
460 N.E.2d 1106, 61 N.Y.2d 730, 472 N.Y.S.2d 621, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4026
This text of 460 N.E.2d 1106 (MATTER OF QUINN v. Tutunjian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
MATTER OF QUINN v. Tutunjian, 460 N.E.2d 1106, 61 N.Y.2d 730, 472 N.Y.S.2d 621, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4026 (N.Y. 1984).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, without costs. We agree with the Appellate Division that the mark was not in the voting square as required by section 9-112 of the Election Law.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Kaye. Taking no part: Judge Simons.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mondello v. Nassau County Board of Elections
6 A.D.3d 18 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Morphy v. Wade
208 A.D.2d 1039 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Scanlon v. Savago
160 A.D.2d 1162 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Minick v. Scranton
145 Misc. 2d 1006 (New York Supreme Court, 1989)
Williams v. Rensselaer County Board of Elections
118 A.D.2d 966 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
460 N.E.2d 1106, 61 N.Y.2d 730, 472 N.Y.S.2d 621, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4026, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-quinn-v-tutunjian-ny-1984.