Matter of Parkhurst v. United Rentals Aerial Equipment, Inc.
958 N.E.2d 119, 17 N.Y.3d 908, 934 N.Y.S.2d 89, 2011 NY Slip Op 8182
Opinion
In the Matter of the Claim of BOB PARKHURST, Claimant,
v.
UNITED RENTALS AERIAL EQUIPMENT, INC., et al., Appellants.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD, Respondent.
In the Matter of the Claim of JAMES ARTHUR ROBINSON, Claimant,
v.
GOULD PUMPS ITT et al., Appellants.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of New York.
*909 Buckner & Kourofsky, LLP, Rochester (Jacklyn M. Penna of counsel), for appellants.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Steven C. Wu, Barbara D. Underwood and Benjamin N. Gutman of counsel), for respondent.
Concur: Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and JONES. Taking no part: Chief Judge LIPPMAN.
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs (see Matter of Raynor v Landmark Chrysler, 18 NY3d ___, 2011 NY Slip Op 08183 [2011] [decided today]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Parkhurst v. United Rentals Aerial Equipment, Inc., 958 N.E.2d 119, 17 N.Y.3d 908, 934 N.Y.S.2d 89, 2011 NY Slip Op 8182 (N.Y. 2011).
958 N.E.2d 119 (Matter of Parkhurst v. United Rentals Aerial Equipment, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Marku v. ABM Industries
133 A.D.3d 993 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)