Matter of Parkhurst v. United Rentals Aerial Equipment, Inc.

958 N.E.2d 119, 17 N.Y.3d 908, 934 N.Y.S.2d 89, 2011 NY Slip Op 8182
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 15, 2011·No. 201·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

17 N.Y.3d 908 (2011)
958 N.E.2d 119
934 N.Y.S.2d 89
2011 NY Slip Op 8182

In the Matter of the Claim of BOB PARKHURST, Claimant,
v.
UNITED RENTALS AERIAL EQUIPMENT, INC., et al., Appellants.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD, Respondent.
In the Matter of the Claim of JAMES ARTHUR ROBINSON, Claimant,
v.
GOULD PUMPS ITT et al., Appellants.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD, Respondent.

No. 201

Court of Appeals of New York.

Argued October 18, 2011.
Decided November 15, 2011.

*909 Buckner & Kourofsky, LLP, Rochester (Jacklyn M. Penna of counsel), for appellants.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Steven C. Wu, Barbara D. Underwood and Benjamin N. Gutman of counsel), for respondent.

Concur: Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and JONES. Taking no part: Chief Judge LIPPMAN.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs (see Matter of Raynor v Landmark Chrysler, 18 NY3d ___, 2011 NY Slip Op 08183 [2011] [decided today]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Parkhurst v. United Rentals Aerial Equipment, Inc., 958 N.E.2d 119, 17 N.Y.3d 908, 934 N.Y.S.2d 89, 2011 NY Slip Op 8182 (N.Y. 2011).

958 N.E.2d 119 (Matter of Parkhurst v. United Rentals Aerial Equipment, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Marku v. ABM Industries
133 A.D.3d 993 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)