Matter of Parkhurst v. United Rentals Aerial Equipment, Inc.
This text of 958 N.E.2d 119 (Matter of Parkhurst v. United Rentals Aerial Equipment, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Claim of BOB PARKHURST, Claimant,
v.
UNITED RENTALS AERIAL EQUIPMENT, INC., et al., Appellants.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD, Respondent.
In the Matter of the Claim of JAMES ARTHUR ROBINSON, Claimant,
v.
GOULD PUMPS ITT et al., Appellants.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of New York.
*909 Buckner & Kourofsky, LLP, Rochester (Jacklyn M. Penna of counsel), for appellants.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Steven C. Wu, Barbara D. Underwood and Benjamin N. Gutman of counsel), for respondent.
Concur: Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and JONES. Taking no part: Chief Judge LIPPMAN.
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs (see Matter of Raynor v Landmark Chrysler, 18 NY3d ___, 2011 NY Slip Op 08183 [2011] [decided today]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
958 N.E.2d 119, 17 N.Y.3d 908, 934 N.Y.S.2d 89, 2011 NY Slip Op 8182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-parkhurst-v-united-rentals-aerial-equipm-ny-2011.