Claim of Parkhurst v. United Rentals Aerial Equipment, Inc.
958 N.E.2d 119, 17 N.Y.3d 908
This text of 958 N.E.2d 119 (Claim of Parkhurst v. United Rentals Aerial Equipment, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Claim of Parkhurst v. United Rentals Aerial Equipment, Inc., 958 N.E.2d 119, 17 N.Y.3d 908 (N.Y. 2011).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs (see Matter of Raynor v Landmark Chrysler, 18 NY3d 48 [2011] [decided today]).
Concur: Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones. Taking no part: Chief Judge Lippman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Matter of Parkhurst v. United Rentals Aerial Equipment, Inc.
958 N.E.2d 119 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
958 N.E.2d 119, 17 N.Y.3d 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-parkhurst-v-united-rentals-aerial-equipment-inc-ny-2011.