Claim of Parkhurst v. United Rentals Aerial Equipment, Inc.
958 N.E.2d 119, 17 N.Y.3d 908
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs (see Matter of Raynor v Landmark Chrysler, 18 NY3d 48 [2011] [decided today]).
Concur: Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones. Taking no part: Chief Judge Lippman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Parkhurst v. United Rentals Aerial Equipment, Inc., 958 N.E.2d 119, 17 N.Y.3d 908 (N.Y. 2011).
958 N.E.2d 119 (Claim of Parkhurst v. United Rentals Aerial Equipment, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Parkhurst v. United Rentals Aerial Equipment, Inc.
958 N.E.2d 119 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)