MATTER OF NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. v. Cutler

New York Court of Appeals

MATTER OF NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. v. Cutler

67 N.Y.2d 812

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 20, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 67 N.Y.2d 812 (MATTER OF NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. v. Cutler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MATTER OF NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. v. Cutler, 67 N.Y.2d 812 (N.Y. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

67 N.Y.2d 812 (1986)

In the Matter of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Respondent,
v.
Elaine Cutler, as Chief Assessor of the Town of Day, et al., Respondents, and Robert Spence, as Assessor of the Town of Edinburg, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued February 13, 1986. Decided March 20, 1986.

Roger L. Paul for appellant.

David R. Murphy for Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, respondent.

Phil Sloan and Robert L. Beebe for State Board of Equalization and Assessment, amicus curiae.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE and HANCOCK, JR.

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons in the opinion by Justice John T. Casey at the Appellate Division (109 AD2d 403).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

67 N.Y.2d 812 (1986)

In the Matter of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Respondent,
v.
Elaine Cutler, as Chief Assessor of the Town of Day, et al., Respondents, and Robert Spence, as Assessor of the Town of Edinburg, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued February 13, 1986. Decided March 20, 1986.

Roger L. Paul for appellant.

David R. Murphy for Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, respondent.

Phil Sloan and Robert L. Beebe for State Board of Equalization and Assessment, amicus curiae.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE and HANCOCK, JR.

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons in the opinion by Justice John T. Casey at the Appellate Division (109 AD2d 403).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 N.Y.2d 812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-niagara-mohawk-power-corp-v-cutler-ny-1986.

Opinion

In the Matter of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Respondent, v. Elaine Cutler, as Chief Assessor of the Town of Day, et al., Respondents, and Robert Spence, as Assessor of the Town of Edinburg, Appellant.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

In the Matter of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Respondent,
v.
Elaine Cutler, as Chief Assessor of the Town of Day, et al., Respondents, and Robert Spence, as Assessor of the Town of Edinburg, Appellant.