Mohawk Valley Water Authority v. State

78 A.D.3d 1513, 910 N.Y.S.2d 397
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 12, 2010·No. Appeal No. 1·Published

Opinion

— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Samuel D. Hester, J.), entered April 24, 2008. The order denied the motion of defendant Erie Boulevard Hydropower, L.E to dismiss plaintiffs ninth and seventeenth causes of action and granted the motion of plaintiff for leave to file and serve an amended complaint.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Smith v Russell Sage Coll., 78 AD2d 913 [1980], affd 54 NY2d 185 [1981], rearg denied 55 NY2d 878 [1982]). Present — Scudder, P.J., Peradotto, Carni, Green and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mohawk Valley Water Authority v. State, 78 A.D.3d 1513, 910 N.Y.S.2d 397 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

78 A.D.3d 1513 (Mohawk Valley Water Authority v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Russell Sage College
429 N.E.2d 746 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
Smith v. Russell Sage College
78 A.D.2d 913 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)