Home/New York Court of Appeals/MATTER OF NEW YORK STATE COALITION OF PUB. EMPLOYERS v. New York State Dep't of Labor

MATTER OF NEW YORK STATE COALITION OF PUB. EMPLOYERS v. New York State Dep't of Labor

457 N.E.2d 785, 60 N.Y.2d 789, 469 N.Y.S.2d 679, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3478
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 25, 1983
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases

This text of 457 N.E.2d 785 (MATTER OF NEW YORK STATE COALITION OF PUB. EMPLOYERS v. New York State Dep't of Labor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MATTER OF NEW YORK STATE COALITION OF PUB. EMPLOYERS v. New York State Dep't of Labor, 457 N.E.2d 785, 60 N.Y.2d 789, 469 N.Y.S.2d 679, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3478 (N.Y. 1983).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

Section 27-a (subd 4, par a) of the Labor Law directed the Industrial (now Labor) Commissioner to adopt by rule all safety and health standards promulgated under the United States Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) which were in effect on December 27, 1980. Pursuant to this direction, the commissioner promulgated and published in the State Register a proposed rule which simply “incorporated by reference” all of the standards in 29 CFR parts 1910 and 1926. (12 NYCRR 800.3.)

*791 In this article 78 proceeding respondents contend that such incorporation by reference violates section 8 of article IV of the New York Constitution, which provides: “No rule or regulation made by any state department * * * [or] officer * * * shall be effective until it is filed in the office of the department of state. The legislature shall provide for the speedy publication of such rules and regulations, by appropriate laws.” The Appellate Division and Special Term have held that this section forbids wholesale incorporation by reference of the OSHA regulations. We agree.

One of the purposes behind section 8 of article IV was to insure the existence of a common and definite place where the exact content of rules and regulations, including any changes, might be found. (People v Cull, 10 NY2d 123, 128.) Apart from contravening this purpose, the rule proposed by the commissioner violates the plain language of section 8, which requires all rules and regulations to be “filed in the office of the department of state” before they become effective. The OSHA regulations have not been filed.

Respondents also argue that the rule is void for vagueness because (1) it fails to specify which of the OSHA regulations were “standards” as opposed to record-keeping requirements; (2) it fails to specify which of the regulations were in effect on December 27, 1980; and (3) it adopts certain standards which are not applicable to the public sector. At such time as appellant complies with the requirement of filing and publishing the regulations, there will be no ambiguity concerning which standards are to apply in New York. Nor can we assume that appellant will choose to include regulations which have no applicability to the public sector. Consequently, it would be premature to pass on the argument that such inclusion would be void. Similarly, given our decision today, it would be pointless to pass on respondents’ contention that the procedure adopted by the commissioner deprived them of their rights under the State Administrative Procedure Act to comment on the proposed regulations.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur.

*792 Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Vaughan v. New York State Dept. of Transp.
2024 NY Slip Op 00106 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Plainview-Old Bethpage Congress of Teachers v. New York State Health Insurance Plan
140 A.D.3d 1329 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
City of New York v. Commissioner of Labor
100 A.D.3d 519 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
City of New York v. Commissioner of Labor
31 Misc. 3d 398 (New York Supreme Court, 2011)
Abdil v. Martinez
194 Misc. 2d 203 (New York Supreme Court, 2002)
Goldstein v. State
188 Misc. 2d 524 (New York Supreme Court, 2001)
New York City Transit Authority v. New York State Department of Labor
666 N.E.2d 1336 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)
New York City Transit Authority v. New York State Department of Labor
211 A.D.2d 432 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Pastore v. Sabol
160 Misc. 2d 983 (New York Supreme Court, 1994)
Warren & Washington Industrial Development Agency v. Village of Hudson Falls Board of Health
168 A.D.2d 847 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Sound Distributing Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority
144 Misc. 2d 1 (New York Supreme Court, 1989)
People v. Scantlebury
143 Misc. 2d 9 (Nassau County District Court, 1989)
People v. SNR Delivery, Inc.
134 Misc. 2d 570 (Suffolk County District Court, 1987)
People v. Kavanaugh
133 Misc. 2d 689 (Suffolk County District Court, 1986)
Council for Owner Occupied Housing, Inc. v. Abrams
133 Misc. 2d 574 (New York Supreme Court, 1986)
People v. Roth
129 Misc. 2d 381 (New York County Courts, 1985)
Jones v. Smith
478 N.E.2d 191 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Sigety v. Axelrod
107 A.D.2d 985 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
American Ass'n of Bioanalysts v. Axelrod
106 A.D.2d 53 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Harris Corp.
104 A.D.2d 130 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
457 N.E.2d 785, 60 N.Y.2d 789, 469 N.Y.S.2d 679, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-new-york-state-coalition-of-pub-employers-v-new-york-state-ny-1983.