Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig.
625 N.E.2d 588, 82 N.Y.2d 821, 605 N.Y.S.2d 3
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Israel Rubin at the Appellate Division (188 AD2d 214; see, Didner v Keene Corp., 82 NY2d 342 [decided today]; Pollicina v Misericordia Hosp. Med. Ctr., 82 NY2d 332 [decided today]).
*825 Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa, Smith and Levine.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 625 N.E.2d 588, 82 N.Y.2d 821, 605 N.Y.S.2d 3 (N.Y. 1993).
625 N.E.2d 588 (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ansonia Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Public Service Mutual Insurance
257 A.D.2d 84 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
In Re Joint Eastern and Southern Dist. Asbestos
9 F. Supp. 2d 307 (S.D. New York, 1998)
Consorti v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
9 F. Supp. 2d 307 (S.D. New York, 1998)
Consorti v. Armstrong World Industries
72 F.3d 1003 (Second Circuit, 1995)
Consorti v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
72 F.3d 1003 (Second Circuit, 1995)
Findley v. Falise
878 F. Supp. 473 (E.D. New York, 1995)
In Re Joint E. & S. Dist. Asbestos Litigation
878 F. Supp. 473 (S.D. New York, 1995)
In Re Keene Corporation
18 F.3d 126 (Second Circuit, 1994)
Bauman v. Keene Corp.
18 F.3d 126 (Second Circuit, 1994)
In Re New York Asbestos Litigation
847 F. Supp. 1086 (S.D. New York, 1994)