Consorti v. Armstrong World Industries

64 F.3d 781, 33 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 79, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24345
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided August 28, 1995·No. 857·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

64 F.3d 781w

Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 14,341
John CONSORTI & Frances Consorti, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., formerly known as
Armstrong Cork Co.; Combustion Engineering, Inc.,
et al., Defendants,
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 857, Docket 94-7501.

United States Court of Appeals,

Second Circuit.

Argued Nov. 14, 1994.
Decided Aug. 28, 1995.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Consorti v. Armstrong World Industries, 64 F.3d 781, 33 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 79, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24345 (2d Cir. 1995).

64 F.3d 781 (Consorti v. Armstrong World Industries) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Complaint of Moran Towing Corp.
984 F. Supp. 2d 150 (S.D. New York, 2013)
Harding v. Onibokun
14 Misc. 3d 790 (New York Supreme Court, 2006)
Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.
518 U.S. 415 (Supreme Court, 1996)
Barry v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
668 N.E.2d 8 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1996)
Consorti v. Armstrong World Industries
72 F.3d 1003 (Second Circuit, 1995)
Lightfoot v. Union Carbide Corp.
901 F. Supp. 166 (S.D. New York, 1995)