Matter of Natilson v. Hodson
This text of 47 N.E.2d 442 (Matter of Natilson v. Hodson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the regulation purported to be adopted by the department exceeds the powers conferred by subdivision a of section 885 of the New York City Charter (1938) upon heads of the departments. No opinion.
*844 Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Conway and Desmond, JJ.
Finch and Lewis, JJ., dissent upon the ground that the rule promulgated by the Commissioner of .Welfare forbidding those employed on full time in the Department of Welfare to engage in outside employment, was a reasonable regulation relating to the internal administration of the Department of Welfare and designed to eliminate a practice which may reasonably be considered to impair efficient conduct of the Department. The Board of Estimate acted also within its authority in providing that none of the moneys appropriated by it should be paid to those engaged in private employment while holding a full time city position.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
47 N.E.2d 442, 289 N.Y. 842, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-natilson-v-hodson-ny-1943.