Matter of Mott v. Krug

17 N.E.2d 129, 278 N.Y. 457, 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1325
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 18, 1938·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In Matter of Burke v. Cohen (265 N. Y. 210) the distinction between constitutional officers and others was abandoned. The opinion in that case referred to city offices, but the principle upon which that case was decided applies to town officers, so that article X, section 5, of the State Constitution applies to an election to fill a vacancy in a town office. Since subdivision 5 of *461 section 64 of the Town Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 62) conflicts with this constitutional provision, it must be held, to be invalid. We pass on no other question.

The order should be affirmed, without costs.

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Mott v. Krug, 17 N.E.2d 129, 278 N.Y. 457, 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1325 (N.Y. 1938).

17 N.E.2d 129 (Matter of Mott v. Krug) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leonard v. Kratoville
179 Misc. 37 (New York Supreme Court, 1942)