Matter of Burke v. Cohen

192 N.E. 296, 265 N.Y. 210, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1017
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 3, 1934·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In the light of fuller experience the distinction drawn by this court in People ex rel. Ward v. Scheu (167 N. Y. 292) between vacancies in offices created by the Constitution and vacancies in other city offices has proven impracticable. Inroads into the rule of that case create constant doubt. We now hold that article X, section 5, of the Constitution applies to all elective city offices.

The order should be affirmed without costs.

Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch and Loughran, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Burke v. Cohen, 192 N.E. 296, 265 N.Y. 210, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1017 (N.Y. 1934).

192 N.E. 296 (Matter of Burke v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Radich v. Council of the City of Lackawanna
93 A.D.2d 559 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Roher v. Dinkins
298 N.E.2d 37 (New York Court of Appeals, 1973)
Roher v. Dinkins
71 Misc. 2d 739 (New York Supreme Court, 1972)
Matter of Ross v. Cohen
28 N.E.2d 883 (New York Court of Appeals, 1940)
Matter of Mott v. Krug
17 N.E.2d 129 (New York Court of Appeals, 1938)
Johnson v. City of New York
9 N.E.2d 30 (New York Court of Appeals, 1937)
Brown v. Sisti
160 Misc. 332 (New York Supreme Court, 1936)
Haggerty v. City of New York
153 Misc. 841 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1934)