Matter of McKinney v. McGoldrick
195 N.E. 372, 266 N.Y. 665, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 1538
Opinion
Motion denied without costs. We may say, however, that in affirming the order of the Appellate Division the court found that chapter 637 of the Laws of 1932 was *666 not intended to apply to the employees of the Transit Commission. Other legislation so indicates. We decided nothing else. Any intimation in the opinion of the Appellate Division that this act of 1932 was repealed by chapter 178 of the Laws of 1934 does not meet with our approval.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of McKinney v. McGoldrick, 195 N.E. 372, 266 N.Y. 665, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 1538 (N.Y. 1935).
195 N.E. 372 (Matter of McKinney v. McGoldrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Blyn v. Bartlett
84 Misc. 2d 394 (New York Supreme Court, 1975)
McCoy v. Mayor of New York
73 Misc. 2d 508 (New York Supreme Court, 1973)
Neuhauser v. La Guardia
250 A.D. 884 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)