MATTER OF McINTOSH v. EF Hauserman Co.

179 N.E.2d 514, 10 N.Y.2d 892
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 16, 1961
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 179 N.E.2d 514 (MATTER OF McINTOSH v. EF Hauserman Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MATTER OF McINTOSH v. EF Hauserman Co., 179 N.E.2d 514, 10 N.Y.2d 892 (N.Y. 1961).

Opinion

10 N.Y.2d 892 (1961)

In the Matter of the Claim of Marion McIntosh, Respondent,
v.
E. F. Hauserman Co. et al., Appellants. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued October 11, 1961.
Decided November 16, 1961.

Paul D. Williams and Kurt Weissheimer for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (John J. Quinn, Paxton Blair and Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.

No appearance for claimant-respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE and FOSTER.

Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen's Compensation Board; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stroer v. Georgia Pacific Corp.
1983 OK 94 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 N.E.2d 514, 10 N.Y.2d 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-mcintosh-v-ef-hauserman-co-ny-1961.