Claim of McIntosh v. E. F. Hauserman Co.
10 N.Y.2d 892
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of McIntosh v. E. F. Hauserman Co., 10 N.Y.2d 892 (N.Y. 1961).
10 N.Y.2d 892 (Claim of McIntosh v. E. F. Hauserman Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stroer v. Georgia Pacific Corp.
1983 OK 94 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1983)
MATTER OF McINTOSH v. EF Hauserman Co.
179 N.E.2d 514 (New York Court of Appeals, 1961)