Claim of McIntosh v. E. F. Hauserman Co.
10 N.Y.2d 892
This text of 10 N.Y.2d 892 (Claim of McIntosh v. E. F. Hauserman Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Claim of McIntosh v. E. F. Hauserman Co., 10 N.Y.2d 892 (N.Y. 1961).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Stroer v. Georgia Pacific Corp.
1983 OK 94 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1983)
MATTER OF McINTOSH v. EF Hauserman Co.
179 N.E.2d 514 (New York Court of Appeals, 1961)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 N.Y.2d 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-mcintosh-v-e-f-hauserman-co-ny-1961.