Matter of Macchiaverna

125 A.D.3d 1043, 3 N.Y.S.3d 182
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 5, 2015
DocketD-13-15
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 125 A.D.3d 1043 (Matter of Macchiaverna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Macchiaverna, 125 A.D.3d 1043, 3 N.Y.S.3d 182 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Louis Macchiaverna was admitted to practice

by this Court in 1998 and was also admitted to practice in New Jersey that same year, where he maintained an office for the practice of law. He was suspended by this Court, effective March 3, 2014, due to his failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 113 AD3d 1020, 1042 [2014]).

By two orders entered July 17, 2014, the Supreme Court of New Jersey imposed upon Macchiaverna consecutive one-year and two-year periods of suspension based upon Macchiaverna engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice by practicing law during separate periods of temporary suspension.

As a result of the discipline imposed in New Jersey, the Committee on Professional Standards moves for an order imposing discipline pursuant to this Court’s rules (see Rules of the App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.19). Macchiaverna has not replied to the motion or otherwise raised any available defenses (see Rules of the App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.19 [d]), and we, therefore, grant the Committee’s motion.

In determining the appropriate discipline, we note the presence of several aggravating factors, including Macchiaverna’s previous September 2011 censure by this Court (Matter of Macchiaverna, 87 AD3d 1176 [2011]), his default herein and his failure to pay applicable registration payments in this state *1044 since 2006. Having considered the nature of Macchiaverna’s misconduct and the consequent discipline imposed in New Jersey, we conclude that Macchiaverna should be suspended from the practice of law in this state for a period of three years (see e.g. Matter of Doyle, 121 AD3d 1401, 1402 [2014]; Matter of Gold, 64 AD3d 990, 992 [2009]).

Lahtinen, J.P., Garry, Rose, Devine and Clark, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the motion of the Committee on Professional Standards is granted; and it is further ordered that Louis Macchiaverna is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years, effective immediately, and until further order of this Court; and it is further ordered that, for the period of suspension, Louis Macchiaverna is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and Macchiaverna is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further ordered that Louis Macchiaverna shall comply with the provisions of this Court’s rules regulating the conduct of suspended attorneys (see Rules of the App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.9).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Neel v. New York Univ.
2026 NY Slip Op 30752(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2026)
Matter of McSwiggan
2019 NY Slip Op 1295 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Matter of Shelton
2017 NY Slip Op 3831 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
In re Shelton
150 A.D.3d 1467 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 A.D.3d 1043, 3 N.Y.S.3d 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-macchiaverna-nyappdiv-2015.