In re Macchiaverna

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Macchiaverna

87 A.D.3d 1176, 929 N.Y.2d 197

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 8, 2011

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 87 A.D.3d 1176 (In re Macchiaverna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Macchiaverna, 87 A.D.3d 1176, 929 N.Y.2d 197 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

By order dated October 19, 2010, the New Jersey Supreme Court publically reprimanded respondent after finding that he engaged in professional misconduct by negligently misappropriating client funds and violating record-keeping rules.

As a result of the discipline imposed in New Jersey, petitioner moves for an order imposing discipline pursuant to this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 806.19). Respondent has not replied to the motion.

Having considered the nature of respondent’s misconduct and the consequent discipline imposed in New Jersey, we conclude that respondent should be censured in this state.

Rose, J.E, Malone Jr., Kavanagh, Garry and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that petitioner’s motion is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is hereby censured.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI