Matter of Lopez v. Justices of the Supreme Court of New York County

New York Court of Appeals

Matter of Lopez v. Justices of the Supreme Court of New York County

335 N.E.2d 857, 36 N.Y.2d 949, 373 N.Y.S.2d 552, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2035

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 16, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 335 N.E.2d 857 (Matter of Lopez v. Justices of the Supreme Court of New York County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Lopez v. Justices of the Supreme Court of New York County, 335 N.E.2d 857, 36 N.Y.2d 949, 373 N.Y.S.2d 552, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2035 (N.Y. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum. Alleging denial of a speedy trial contrary to statutory and constitutional rights, under an indictment charging possession of a weapon as a felony, petitioner instituted this CPLR article 78 proceeding in the Appellate Division, First Department, against the Justices of the Supreme Court and the District Attorney, New York County. Since said claim is not cognizable in such a proceeding, but may be reviewed on an appeal in the criminal action (Matter of Scranton v Supreme Ct. of State of N. Y., 36 NY2d 704; Matter of State of New York v King, 36 NY2d 59, 62; Matter of Watts v Supreme Ct. of State of N. Y., 28 NY2d 714; Matter *950 of Lee v County Ct. of Erie County, 27 NY2d 432, 437; Matter of Blake v Hogan, 25 NY2d 747), the judgment denying the application and dismissing the petition should be affirmed, without costs.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Judgment affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum. Alleging denial of a speedy trial contrary to statutory and constitutional rights, under an indictment charging possession of a weapon as a felony, petitioner instituted this CPLR article 78 proceeding in the Appellate Division, First Department, against the Justices of the Supreme Court and the District Attorney, New York County. Since said claim is not cognizable in such a proceeding, but may be reviewed on an appeal in the criminal action (Matter of Scranton v Supreme Ct. of State of N. Y., 36 NY2d 704; Matter of State of New York v King, 36 NY2d 59, 62; Matter of Watts v Supreme Ct. of State of N. Y., 28 NY2d 714; Matter *950 of Lee v County Ct. of Erie County, 27 NY2d 432, 437; Matter of Blake v Hogan, 25 NY2d 747), the judgment denying the application and dismissing the petition should be affirmed, without costs.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Judgment affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

335 N.E.2d 857, 36 N.Y.2d 949, 373 N.Y.S.2d 552, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2035, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-lopez-v-justices-of-the-supreme-court-of-new-york-county-ny-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack