Blake v. Hogan
This text of 250 N.E.2d 568 (Blake v. Hogan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs. The record, in our view, supports the conclusion — reached by the Appellate Division when it denied the petitioners-appellants ’ motion in the criminal case to dismiss the indictment —that there had been no denial of the constitutional right to a speedy trial in view of the fact that they had acquiesced in the delay complained of. On the procedural issue, we do not believe that the extraordinary remedy of prohibition is proper under the circumstances of this case.
Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitbl and Jasen concur.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
250 N.E.2d 568, 25 N.Y.2d 747, 303 N.Y.S.2d 505, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blake-v-hogan-ny-1969.