Home/New York Court of Appeals/Blake v. Hogan

Blake v. Hogan

250 N.E.2d 568, 25 N.Y.2d 747, 303 N.Y.S.2d 505, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1229
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 2, 1969·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs. The record, in our view, supports the conclusion — reached by the Appellate Division when it denied the petitioners-appellants ’ motion in the criminal case to dismiss the indictment —that there had been no denial of the constitutional right to a speedy trial in view of the fact that they had acquiesced in the delay complained of. On the procedural issue, we do not believe that the extraordinary remedy of prohibition is proper under the circumstances of this case.

Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitbl and Jasen concur.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blake v. Hogan, 250 N.E.2d 568, 25 N.Y.2d 747, 303 N.Y.S.2d 505, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1229 (N.Y. 1969).

250 N.E.2d 568 (Blake v. Hogan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gouiran Holdings, Inc. v. Miller
140 Misc. 2d 142 (New York Supreme Court, 1988)
Rush v. Mordue
502 N.E.2d 170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Owen v. Stroebel
102 A.D.2d 651 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Carey v. Kitson
93 A.D.2d 50 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Brockway v. Monroe
89 A.D.2d 771 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Gold v. Gartenstein
100 Misc. 2d 253 (New York Supreme Court, 1979)
Forte v. Supreme Court
62 A.D.2d 704 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Valenti v. Mark
59 A.D.2d 651 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
La Rocca v. Lane
338 N.E.2d 606 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Matter of Lopez v. Justices of the Supreme Court of New York County
335 N.E.2d 857 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)