Matter of Lieblich v. Cohen
This text of 37 N.E.2d 558 (Matter of Lieblich v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Finding No. 6 states: “ I further find that regardless of the date of the signature, 487 such signers were duly registered from the addresses stated but that 1940 election districts instead of the 1941 election districts appeared opposite their addresses, the numbers of their said election districts having been changed by the Board of Elections in 1941.” The provisions of section 137 of the Election Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 17) must be complied with. Finding No. 6 does not show compliance here. (Matter *562 of McElroy v. Cohen, 286 N. Y. 686.) Change of election districts by maps filed in 1941 does not excuse the Signers from compliance with the provisions of the statute. The petition, therefore, does not contain sufficient signatures even if we were to hold that the signatures of the two sets of petitions might be counted together.
The orders should be affirmed, without costs.
Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ., concur.
Orders affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 N.E.2d 558, 286 N.Y. 559, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 1407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-lieblich-v-cohen-ny-1941.