In re Fales
This text of 264 A.D. 949 (In re Fales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed on the law, without costs, and application denied, without costs. The requirement of section 135 of the Election Law, as amended by chapter 182 of the Laws of 1941, that in each instance the town, or city of residence of the signer of the petition be set forth, is mandatory. (Matter of Lieblich v. Cohen, 286 N. Y. 559; Matter of McElroy v. Cohen, Id. 686.) Setting forth the name of the village does not comply with this requirement. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
264 A.D. 949, 36 N.Y.S.2d 441, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fales-nyappdiv-1942.