Matter of Lansner v. Bd. of Elections of the City of New York
This text of 529 N.E.2d 170 (Matter of Lansner v. Bd. of Elections of the City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.
Contrary to respondents’ contention, the proceeding to validate petitioners’ designations as County Committeepersons was not brought by Lansner in a representative capacity. *930 Rather, it was commenced by the candidates in their individual capacities as petitioners. Moreover, the petition was properly verified solely by Lansner since, in this case, the petitioners were "united in interest” (CPLR 3020 [d]; see, Matter of Castillo v Maclara, 63 NY2d 682, 683). Respondents’ remaining arguments are unpreserved or without merit.
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur; Judge Titone taking no part.
Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
529 N.E.2d 170, 72 N.Y.2d 929, 532 N.Y.S.2d 840, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 2104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-lansner-v-bd-of-elections-of-the-city-of-new-york-ny-1988.