Collins v. Marchi

New York Court of Appeals

Collins v. Marchi

529 N.E.2d 171, 72 N.Y.2d 930, 532 N.Y.S.2d 841, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 2598

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 2, 1988

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 529 N.E.2d 171 (Collins v. Marchi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Collins v. Marchi, 529 N.E.2d 171, 72 N.Y.2d 930, 532 N.Y.S.2d 841, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 2598 (N.Y. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order reversed, without costs, and (a) petitions seeking validation with respect to the candidates as to whom objectors before the Board were not qualified to file objections under section 6-154 (2) of the Election Law reinstated and granted; (b) petitions seeking validation with respect to the candidates as to whom objectors before the Board were qualified to file objections under section 6-154 (2) reinstated and remitted to Supreme Court, Bronx County, for determination on the merits (see, Lucariello v Niebel, 72 NY2d 927 [decided today]; Matter of Lansner v Board of Elections, 72 NY2d 929 [decided today]).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa. Taking no part: Judge Titone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order reversed, without costs, and (a) petitions seeking validation with respect to the candidates as to whom objectors before the Board were not qualified to file objections under section 6-154 (2) of the Election Law reinstated and granted; (b) petitions seeking validation with respect to the candidates as to whom objectors before the Board were qualified to file objections under section 6-154 (2) reinstated and remitted to Supreme Court, Bronx County, for determination on the merits (see, Lucariello v Niebel, 72 NY2d 927 [decided today]; Matter of Lansner v Board of Elections, 72 NY2d 929 [decided today]).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa. Taking no part: Judge Titone.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

529 N.E.2d 171, 72 N.Y.2d 930, 532 N.Y.S.2d 841, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 2598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-marchi-ny-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack