Matter of Laliveres v. Prack

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 5, 2015
Docket519046
StatusPublished

This text of Matter of Laliveres v. Prack (Matter of Laliveres v. Prack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Laliveres v. Prack, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: February 5, 2015 519046 ________________________________

In the Matter of RASHID LALIVERES, Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

ALBERT PRACK, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent. ________________________________

Calendar Date: December 2, 2014

Before: Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Lynch and Devine, JJ.

__________

Rashid Laliveres, Dannemora, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a disciplinary determination finding him guilty of drug use. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge refunded to his inmate account. We note that, although not referenced in the letter from the Attorney General, "any loss of good time incurred -2- 519046

by petitioner as a result of the determination should be restored" (Matter of Benitez v Fischer, 118 AD3d 1237, 1238 [2014] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). Otherwise, petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and this proceeding is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Canales-Sanchez v Schneiderman, 107 AD3d 1258, 1259 [2013]).

Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Lynch and Devine, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Canales-Sanchez v. Schneiderman
107 A.D.3d 1258 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Benitez v. Fischer
118 A.D.3d 1237 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Matter of Laliveres v. Prack, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-laliveres-v-prack-nyappdiv-2015.