Canales-Sanchez v. Schneiderman

107 A.D.3d 1258, 966 N.Y.S.2d 924
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 20, 2013
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 107 A.D.3d 1258 (Canales-Sanchez v. Schneiderman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Canales-Sanchez v. Schneiderman, 107 A.D.3d 1258, 966 N.Y.S.2d 924 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violent conduct, attempted assault on staff, interfering with staff and refusing a direct order. The Attorney General has informed this Court that, during the pendency of this proceeding, the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the mandatory surcharge has been refunded to his inmate account. We note that, although [1259]*1259not referenced in the Attorney General’s letter, “any loss of good time incurred by petitioner as a result of the determination should be restored” (Matter of Pereira v Fischer, 87 AD3d 1192, 1192 [2011]). Consequently, inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Sykes v Fischer, 98 AD3d 769, 770 [2012]; Matter of Marcial v Fischer, 96 AD3d 1245, 1246 [2012]).

Rose, J.P., Lahtinen, McCarthy and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Ramos v. Prack
125 A.D.3d 1029 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Matter of Laliveres v. Prack
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
Mercer v. Superintendent of the Livingston Correctional Facility
112 A.D.3d 1259 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
McDonald v. Fischer
111 A.D.3d 1207 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 A.D.3d 1258, 966 N.Y.S.2d 924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/canales-sanchez-v-schneiderman-nyappdiv-2013.