MATTER OF INNER CIRCLE REST., INC. v. New York State Liquor Auth.

New York Court of Appeals

MATTER OF INNER CIRCLE REST., INC. v. New York State Liquor Auth.

281 N.E.2d 183, 30 N.Y.2d 541, 330 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1516

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 10, 1972

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 281 N.E.2d 183 (MATTER OF INNER CIRCLE REST., INC. v. New York State Liquor Auth.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MATTER OF INNER CIRCLE REST., INC. v. New York State Liquor Auth., 281 N.E.2d 183, 30 N.Y.2d 541, 330 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1516 (N.Y. 1972).

Pincite

Opinions

Order reversed, without costs, and the case remitted to Special Term with directions to remand the matter to the State Liquor Authority for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: In treating this as a “ single instance ” case within the meaning of Matter of Stanwood United v. O’Connell (283 App. Div. 79, 82, aifd. 306 N. Y. 749), the Appellate Division erred, inasmuch as any determination adverse to the licensee would have to rest upon a finding that the licensee’s agent, the bartender, was instrumental in creating the disorder alleged (Matter of Club 95 v. New York State Liq. Auth., 23 N Y 2d 784). Upon the new hearing which our reversal mandates, the police officer’s memorandum book should be made available (Matter of Garabedian v. New York State Liq. Auth., 33 A D 2d 980, mot. for Iv. to app. den. 26 N Y 2d 614). Inasmuch as petitioner was denied a full hearing, we do not reach the question of whether there was substantial evidence to support the determination of the Authority.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed, without costs, and the case remitted to Special Term with directions to remand the matter to the State Liquor Authority for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: In treating this as a “ single instance ” case within the meaning of Matter of Stanwood United v. O’Connell (283 App. Div. 79, 82, aifd. 306 N. Y. 749), the Appellate Division erred, inasmuch as any determination adverse to the licensee would have to rest upon a finding that the licensee’s agent, the bartender, was instrumental in creating the disorder alleged (Matter of Club 95 v. New York State Liq. Auth., 23 N Y 2d 784). Upon the new hearing which our reversal mandates, the police officer’s memorandum book should be made available (Matter of Garabedian v. New York State Liq. Auth., 33 A D 2d 980, mot. for Iv. to app. den. 26 N Y 2d 614). Inasmuch as petitioner was denied a full hearing, we do not reach the question of whether there was substantial evidence to support the determination of the Authority.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 N.E.2d 183, 30 N.Y.2d 541, 330 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-inner-circle-rest-inc-v-new-york-state-liquor-auth-ny-1972.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack