Matter of Herczegh v. Capolino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Herczegh v. Capolino

140 A.D.3d 957, 32 N.Y.S.3d 512

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 2016

Docket2015-10617

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 140 A.D.3d 957 (Matter of Herczegh v. Capolino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Herczegh v. Capolino, 140 A.D.3d 957, 32 N.Y.S.3d 512 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County (Sherri L. Eisenpress, J.), entered October 5, 2015. The order denied the father’s objections to an order of the same court (Rachelle C. Kaufman, S.M.) entered July 17, 2015, which, inter alia, without a hearing and upon the parties’ consent, granted the mother’s petition for an upward modification of the father’s child support obligation.

*958 Ordered that the order entered October 5, 2015, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly denied the father’s objections to the order entered July 17, 2015, as that order was entered upon the consent of the parties (see Matter of Hackett v Paluck, 100 AD3d 898, 899 [2012]; Matter of Cabral v Cabral, 61 AD3d 863, 864 [2009]; Matter of Bien-Aime-Schneider v Schneider, 5 AD3d 763 [2004]; Matter of Proulx v Ardito, 289 AD2d 581 [2001]).

Rivera, J.R, Cohen, Maltese and LaSalle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County (Sherri L. Eisenpress, J.), entered October 5, 2015. The order denied the father’s objections to an order of the same court (Rachelle C. Kaufman, S.M.) entered July 17, 2015, which, inter alia, without a hearing and upon the parties’ consent, granted the mother’s petition for an upward modification of the father’s child support obligation.

*958 Ordered that the order entered October 5, 2015, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly denied the father’s objections to the order entered July 17, 2015, as that order was entered upon the consent of the parties (see Matter of Hackett v Paluck, 100 AD3d 898, 899 [2012]; Matter of Cabral v Cabral, 61 AD3d 863, 864 [2009]; Matter of Bien-Aime-Schneider v Schneider, 5 AD3d 763 [2004]; Matter of Proulx v Ardito, 289 AD2d 581 [2001]).

Rivera, J.R, Cohen, Maltese and LaSalle, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 A.D.3d 957, 32 N.Y.S.3d 512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-herczegh-v-capolino-nyappdiv-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack