Bien-Aime-Schneider v. Schneider

5 A.D.3d 763, 773 N.Y.S.2d 617
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 29, 2004·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Sullivan, J.), dated May 30, 2003, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Kahlon, H.E.), dated July 8, 2002, which, after a hearing, and upon the parties’ consent, directed him to pay $250 per week as child support for the parties’ two children.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly denied the appellant’s objections [764] to the order dated July 8, 2002. There was no basis upon which he could object to the amount of his child support obligation set forth in that order, since it was established upon the consent of the parties (see Matter of Benerofe v Wechsler, 281 AD2d 476 [2001]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Florio, Krausman and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bien-Aime-Schneider v. Schneider, 5 A.D.3d 763, 773 N.Y.S.2d 617 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

5 A.D.3d 763 (Bien-Aime-Schneider v. Schneider) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of George v. Neville
143 A.D.3d 711 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Matter of Herczegh v. Capolino
140 A.D.3d 957 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Hackett v. Paluck
100 A.D.3d 898 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Cabral v. Cabral
61 A.D.3d 863 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)