Matter of Hawes

111 N.E. 211, 217 N.Y. 602, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1352
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 18, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 111 N.E. 211 (Matter of Hawes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Hawes, 111 N.E. 211, 217 N.Y. 602, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1352 (N.Y. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order should be affirmed upon the

ground that there is some evidence to support the charges, and that questions relating to the comparative weight of evidence or the fairness of the sentence, whatever may be our views about them, are beyond our jurisdiction (Matter of Flannery, 212 N. Y. 610).

Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Seabury and Pound, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Kelly
244 N.E.2d 456 (New York Court of Appeals, 1968)
In re Greenfield
24 A.D.2d 651 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
In re Axtell
235 A.D. 350 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)
Matter of Axtell
177 N.E. 423 (New York Court of Appeals, 1931)
In re Maisel
227 A.D. 522 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)
In re Proceedings to Disbar Bevans
225 A.D. 427 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 N.E. 211, 217 N.Y. 602, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-hawes-ny-1916.