Matter of Hawes
111 N.E. 211, 217 N.Y. 602, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1352
Opinion
The order should be affirmed upon the
ground that there is some evidence to support the charges, and that questions relating to the comparative weight of evidence or the fairness of the sentence, whatever may be our views about them, are beyond our jurisdiction (Matter of Flannery, 212 N. Y. 610).
Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Seabury and Pound, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Hawes, 111 N.E. 211, 217 N.Y. 602, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1352 (N.Y. 1916).
111 N.E. 211 (Matter of Hawes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Kelly
244 N.E.2d 456 (New York Court of Appeals, 1968)
In re Greenfield
24 A.D.2d 651 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
In re Axtell
235 A.D. 350 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)
Matter of Axtell
177 N.E. 423 (New York Court of Appeals, 1931)
In re Maisel
227 A.D. 522 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)
In re Proceedings to Disbar Bevans
225 A.D. 427 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)