Matter of Axtell

177 N.E. 423, 257 N.Y. 210, 1931 N.Y. LEXIS 843
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 15, 1931·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The acts of solicitation proved against the appellant attorney are extenuated, but not excused, by his relations to the mariners’ union and to foreign consulates.

*211 The sentence of disbarment is a severe one, but misconduct being proved, the punishment to follow was to be determined by the Appellate Division, and is not subject to revision here (Matter of Hawes, 217 N. Y. 602).

The court that pronounced the sentence has jurisdiction exclusive of any other to mitigate its rigor.

The order should be affirmed.

Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Axtell, 177 N.E. 423, 257 N.Y. 210, 1931 N.Y. LEXIS 843 (N.Y. 1931).

177 N.E. 423 (Matter of Axtell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Baker
272 N.E.2d 337 (New York Court of Appeals, 1971)
In re Kelly
244 N.E.2d 456 (New York Court of Appeals, 1968)
In re O'Doherty
14 A.D.2d 4 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
Erie County Water Authority v. Western New York Water Co.
107 N.E.2d 479 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)
In re Axtell
235 A.D. 350 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)