Matter of Axtell
This text of 177 N.E. 423 (Matter of Axtell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The acts of solicitation proved against the appellant attorney are extenuated, but not excused, by his relations to the mariners’ union and to foreign consulates.
*211 The sentence of disbarment is a severe one, but misconduct being proved, the punishment to follow was to be determined by the Appellate Division, and is not subject to revision here (Matter of Hawes, 217 N. Y. 602).
The court that pronounced the sentence has jurisdiction exclusive of any other to mitigate its rigor.
The order should be affirmed.
Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
177 N.E. 423, 257 N.Y. 210, 1931 N.Y. LEXIS 843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-axtell-ny-1931.