MATTER OF HAMILTON v. Monaghan

136 N.E.2d 711, 1 N.Y.2d 877, 154 N.Y.S.2d 637, 1956 N.Y. LEXIS 770
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 11, 1956·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

[879] Order affirmed, upon the ground that the Appellate Division had power to direct that the facts be tried out instead of being decided on conflicting and incomplete allegations of affidavits. We pass upon no other questions. The question certified on appellant-respondent’s appeal is answered in the affirmative. The question certified on respondent-appellant’s appeal is answered in the negative. No opinion.

Concur: Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Van Voorhis, JJ. Conway, Ch. J., dissents in the following opinion in which Froessel, J., concurs. Taking no- part: Burke, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MATTER OF HAMILTON v. Monaghan, 136 N.E.2d 711, 1 N.Y.2d 877, 154 N.Y.S.2d 637, 1956 N.Y. LEXIS 770 (N.Y. 1956).

136 N.E.2d 711 (MATTER OF HAMILTON v. Monaghan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States ex rel. Burke v. Denno
148 F. Supp. 498 (S.D. New York, 1957)
MATTER OF HAMILTON v. Monaghan
136 N.E.2d 711 (New York Court of Appeals, 1956)