MATTER OF HAMILTON v. Monaghan

136 N.E.2d 711, 1 N.Y.2d 877, 154 N.Y.S.2d 637, 1956 N.Y. LEXIS 770
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 11, 1956
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 136 N.E.2d 711 (MATTER OF HAMILTON v. Monaghan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MATTER OF HAMILTON v. Monaghan, 136 N.E.2d 711, 1 N.Y.2d 877, 154 N.Y.S.2d 637, 1956 N.Y. LEXIS 770 (N.Y. 1956).

Opinions

[879]*879Order affirmed, upon the ground that the Appellate Division had power to direct that the facts be tried out instead of being decided on conflicting and incomplete allegations of affidavits. We pass upon no other questions. The question certified on appellant-respondent’s appeal is answered in the affirmative. The question certified on respondent-appellant’s appeal is answered in the negative. No opinion.

Concur: Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Van Voorhis, JJ. Conway, Ch. J., dissents in the following opinion in which Froessel, J., concurs. Taking no- part: Burke, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States ex rel. Burke v. Denno
148 F. Supp. 498 (S.D. New York, 1957)
MATTER OF HAMILTON v. Monaghan
136 N.E.2d 711 (New York Court of Appeals, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 N.E.2d 711, 1 N.Y.2d 877, 154 N.Y.S.2d 637, 1956 N.Y. LEXIS 770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-hamilton-v-monaghan-ny-1956.