MATTER OF HALPERIN v. Caputa
8 N.Y.2d 916
Opinion
In the Matter of George P. Halperin et al., Respondents-Appellants,
v.
Joseph J. Caputa, as State Rent Administrator, Appellant-Respondent. 969 Realty Company, Intervenor-Appellant-Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Emory Gardiner and Harold Zucker for appellant-respondent.
Arthur Karger and Robert S. Fougner for intervenor-appellant-respondent.
Lewis M. Isaacs, Jr., Raymond E. Burdick and Murray Schwartz for respondents-appellants.
Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, BURKE and FOSTER. Judge VAN VOORHIS dissents and votes to reverse and to reinstate the order of Special Term.
Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
MATTER OF HALPERIN v. Caputa, 8 N.Y.2d 916 (N.Y. 1960).
8 N.Y.2d 916 (MATTER OF HALPERIN v. Caputa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Halperin v. Caputa
168 N.E.2d 834 (New York Court of Appeals, 1960)