MATTER OF HALPERIN v. Caputa

New York Court of Appeals

MATTER OF HALPERIN v. Caputa

8 N.Y.2d 916

DecidedJune 10, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 8 N.Y.2d 916 (MATTER OF HALPERIN v. Caputa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MATTER OF HALPERIN v. Caputa, 8 N.Y.2d 916 (N.Y. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

8 N.Y.2d 916 (1960)

In the Matter of George P. Halperin et al., Respondents-Appellants,
v.
Joseph J. Caputa, as State Rent Administrator, Appellant-Respondent. 969 Realty Company, Intervenor-Appellant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued May 25, 1960. Decided June 10, 1960.

Emory Gardiner and Harold Zucker for appellant-respondent.

Arthur Karger and Robert S. Fougner for intervenor-appellant-respondent.

Lewis M. Isaacs, Jr., Raymond E. Burdick and Murray Schwartz for respondents-appellants.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, BURKE and FOSTER. Judge VAN VOORHIS dissents and votes to reverse and to reinstate the order of Special Term.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

8 N.Y.2d 916 (1960)

In the Matter of George P. Halperin et al., Respondents-Appellants,
v.
Joseph J. Caputa, as State Rent Administrator, Appellant-Respondent. 969 Realty Company, Intervenor-Appellant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued May 25, 1960. Decided June 10, 1960.

Emory Gardiner and Harold Zucker for appellant-respondent.

Arthur Karger and Robert S. Fougner for intervenor-appellant-respondent.

Lewis M. Isaacs, Jr., Raymond E. Burdick and Murray Schwartz for respondents-appellants.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, BURKE and FOSTER. Judge VAN VOORHIS dissents and votes to reverse and to reinstate the order of Special Term.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 N.Y.2d 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-halperin-v-caputa-ny-1960.

Opinion

In the Matter of George P. Halperin et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. Joseph J. Caputa, as State Rent Administrator, Appellant-Respondent. 969 Realty Company, Intervenor-Appellant-Respondent.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

In the Matter of George P. Halperin et al., Respondents-Appellants,
v.
Joseph J. Caputa, as State Rent Administrator, Appellant-Respondent. 969 Realty Company, Intervenor-Appellant-Respondent.