Halperin v. Caputa
168 N.E.2d 834, 8 N.Y.2d 916, 204 N.Y.S.2d 162, 1960 N.Y. LEXIS 1143
This text of 168 N.E.2d 834 (Halperin v. Caputa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Halperin v. Caputa, 168 N.E.2d 834, 8 N.Y.2d 916, 204 N.Y.S.2d 162, 1960 N.Y. LEXIS 1143 (N.Y. 1960).
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Burke and Foster. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse and to reinstate the order of Special Term.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
MATTER OF HALPERIN v. Caputa
8 N.Y.2d 916 (New York Court of Appeals, 1960)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
168 N.E.2d 834, 8 N.Y.2d 916, 204 N.Y.S.2d 162, 1960 N.Y. LEXIS 1143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halperin-v-caputa-ny-1960.