Matter of Grandy

627 P.2d 895, 52 Or. App. 15, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 2464
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided May 4, 1981·No. 1215, CA 17656·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

*17 JOSEPH, C. J.

This matter is before us on the petition of appellant’s appointed attorney for allowance of costs and an attorney fee pursuant to ORS 138.50CK3) 1 and ORS 135.055(1) and (2). 2 The petition was not mailed before the 20th day following our decision (50 Or App 239, 623 P2d 666 (1980)), and it was received in the State Court Administrator’s office on the 22nd day. No extension of time had been requested. It was denied solely because it was not timely filed. The attorney has moved for reconsideration. The motion for reconsideration is allowed.

*18 The relevant statutes and Rules of Appellate Procedure 3 have been applied to deny cost bills and petitions for fees not received by the 20th day after a decision in a case. See, e.g., State ex rel Town Conc. v. Andersen, 265 Or 593, 510 P2d 564 (1973). The imperative wording of the rules supports that application. In only a few instances, where a showing has been made that extraordinary circumstances beyond counsel’s control prevented the timely receipt of cost bills or petitions, have we allowed them despite their untimeliness. It has been felt that to give the rules a more flexible reading would introduce a "line drawing” process that would eventuate in other arbitrary standards or purely ad hoc decisions.

In this particular instance we conclude that, on the showing made in the motion for reconsideration, the untimeliness was not the result of circumstances which were fairly beyond counsel’s control. The petition for costs and an attorney fee is denied.

Henceforth, in the consideration of cost bills and petitions for costs and/or attorney fees, we will apply an adaptation of the provisions of ORS 19.028, 4 which relates to notices of appeal. Any cost bill or petition received late by the State Court Administrator will be administratively denied. If the cost bill was mailed by registered or certified mail on or before the twentieth day after the day of the *19 decision, however, it will be allowed on the furnishing of such proof, if it is otherwise sufficient.

We also take this opportunity to point out that a petition for an attorney fee must be supported by sufficient information to permit us to perform our function under ORS 135.055(3). 5 Attention is called to Appendix L of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. A mere summation and totalling of hours spent on a case will not suffice to support a petition for attorney fees.

Motion for reconsideration allowed; petition for costs and attorney fees denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Grandy, 627 P.2d 895, 52 Or. App. 15, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 2464 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).

627 P.2d 895 (Matter of Grandy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Russell v. Nikon, Inc.
140 P.3d 1179 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2006)
Thompson v. Long
798 P.2d 729 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1990)
Parker v. Scharbach
707 P.2d 85 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1985)
State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Gonzales
703 P.2d 271 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1985)