Matter of Global Liberty Ins. Co. v. Professional Chiropractic Care, P.C.

139 A.D.3d 645, 30 N.Y.S.3d 868
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 31, 2016
Docket1341N 261079/14
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 139 A.D.3d 645 (Matter of Global Liberty Ins. Co. v. Professional Chiropractic Care, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Global Liberty Ins. Co. v. Professional Chiropractic Care, P.C., 139 A.D.3d 645, 30 N.Y.S.3d 868 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, Jr., J.), entered July 10, 2015, which denied the petition to vacate a master arbitrator’s award, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the petition granted, and the award vacated. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

*646 The master arbitrator’s award was arbitrary because it irrationally ignored the law, which petitioner insurer had presented to the master arbitrator, that the no-fault policy issued by petitioner was void ab initio due to respondent’s assignor’s failure to attend duly scheduled independent medical exams (see American Tr. Ins. Co. v Lucas, 111 AD3d 423, 424 [1st Dept 2013]). The alleged error in petitioner’s denial of claim form is of “no moment” (Unitrin Advantage Ins. Co. v Bayshore Physical Therapy, PLLC, 82 AD3d 559, 560 [1st Dept 2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 705 [2011]), and was not a sufficient or rational basis for the award (see Auto One Ins. Co. v Hillside Chiropractic, P.C., 126 AD3d 423, 424 [1st Dept 2015], citing Matter of Petrofsky [Allstate Ins. Co.], 54 NY2d 207, 211 [1981]).

Respondent waived its objections regarding improper service of the petition, since it never moved to dismiss the petition on those grounds (see CPLR 3211 [e]; B.N. Realty Assoc. v Lichtenstein, 21 AD3d 793, 796 [1st Dept 2005]; Matter of Resnick v Town of Canaan, 38 AD3d 949, 951 [3d Dept 2007]).

Concur— Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Moskowitz, Richter and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of American Tr. Ins. Co. v. Smart Choice Med., P.C.
2023 NY Slip Op 03191 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Matter of Global Liberty Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. Capital Chiropractic, P.C.
2020 NY Slip Op 1466 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Matter of Global Liberty Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. Top Q. Inc.
2019 NY Slip Op 6445 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Matter of Global Liberty Ins. Co. v. ISurply, LLC
2018 NY Slip Op 4961 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Matter of Global Liberty Ins. Co. v. Therapeutic Physical Therapy, P.C.
2017 NY Slip Op 1833 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 A.D.3d 645, 30 N.Y.S.3d 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-global-liberty-ins-co-v-professional-chiropractic-care-pc-nyappdiv-2016.