Matter of Global Liberty Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. Capital Chiropractic, P.C.

2020 NY Slip Op 1466
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 3, 2020
Docket1117121999/19E
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 1466 (Matter of Global Liberty Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. Capital Chiropractic, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Global Liberty Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. Capital Chiropractic, P.C., 2020 NY Slip Op 1466 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Matter of Global Liberty Ins. Co. of N.Y. v Capital Chiropractic, P.C. (2020 NY Slip Op 01466)
Matter of Global Liberty Ins. Co. of N.Y. v Capital Chiropractic, P.C.
2020 NY Slip Op 01466
Decided on March 3, 2020
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 3, 2020
Renwick, J.P., Gische, Kern, Singh, JJ.

1117121999/19E

[*1] In re Global Liberty Insurance Company of New York, Petitioner-Appellant,

v

Capital Chiropractic, P.C., Assignee of Oliver Rigor, Respondent-Respondent.


Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C., Garden City (Jason Tenenbaum of counsel), for appellant.

Fazio, Rynsky & Associates, LLP, Syosset (Svetlana Sobel of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Donna Mills, J.), entered April 16, 2019, which denied the petition to vacate a master arbitrator's award, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the petition granted.

The master arbitrator's award was arbitrary in that it irrationally ignored well-established precedent that "the no-fault policy issued by petitioner was void ab initio due to respondent's assignor's failure to attend duly scheduled independent medical exams" (Matter of Global Liberty Ins. Co. of N.Y. v Top Q. Inc., 175 AD3d 1131, 1131 [1st Dept 2019]; see Matter of Global Liberty Ins. Co. v Professional Chiropractic Care, P.C., 139 AD3d 645, 646 [1st Dept 2016]; Unitrin Advantage Ins. Co. v Bayshore Physical Therapy, PLLC, 82 AD3d 559, 560 [1st Dept 2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 705 [2011]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: MARCH 3, 2020

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Global Liberty Ins. Co. v. Professional Chiropractic Care, P.C.
139 A.D.3d 645 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Unitrin Advantage Insurance v. Bayshore Physical Therapy, PLLC
82 A.D.3d 559 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 1466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-global-liberty-ins-co-of-ny-v-capital-chiropractic-pc-nyappdiv-2020.