Matter of General Footwear v. A.C. Lawrence Leather

170 N.E. 149, 252 N.Y. 577, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 657
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 3, 1929·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of General Footwear v. A.C. Lawrence Leather, 170 N.E. 149, 252 N.Y. 577, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 657 (N.Y. 1929).

170 N.E. 149 (Matter of General Footwear v. A.C. Lawrence Leather) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sheets v. Sheets
22 A.D.2d 176 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)
In re the Arbitration between Flotill Products, Inc. & Buitoni Foods Corp.
14 A.D.2d 328 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
GAMBLE ET UX v. Sukut
302 P.2d 553 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1956)
In Re the Arbitration Between Utility Laundry Service, Inc. & Sklar
90 N.E.2d 178 (New York Court of Appeals, 1949)
In re the Arbitration between Utility Laundry Service, Inc. & Sklar
275 A.D.2d 838 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)
In Re Utility Oil Corporation
69 F.2d 524 (Second Circuit, 1934)
Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.
169 N.E. 386 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)