Matter of Ferone v. Magnussen
This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 05207 (Matter of Ferone v. Magnussen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| Matter of Ferone v Magnussen |
| 2020 NY Slip Op 05207 |
| Decided on September 30, 2020 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on September 30, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J.
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
ROBERT J. MILLER
PAUL WOOTEN, JJ.
2019-01508
(Docket No. F-36340-16/17D)
v
Keith Thomas Magnussen, appellant.
Keith Thomas Magnussen, Brooklyn, NY, appellant pro se.
DECISION & ORDER
In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Jacqueline B. Deane, J.), dated January 3, 2018. The order denied, as untimely, the father's objections to an order of the same court (Elizabeth Shamahs, S.M.) dated October 1, 2018, which denied the father's motion for an award of counsel fees.
ORDERED that the order dated January 3, 2018, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The parties are the parents of one minor child. In this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the Support Magistrate issued an order denying the father's motion for an award of counsel fees. The father filed objections to the Support Magistrate's order, and the Family Court denied his objections as untimely. The father appeals.
"Objections to an order of a Support Magistrate must be filed within 35 days after the date on which the order is mailed to the objecting party" (Matter of Verzhbo v Grubelich, 147 AD3d 864, 865; see Family Ct Act § 439[e]). On this record, we agree with the Family Court's determination denying the father's objections to the Support Magistrate's order as untimely (see Matter of Bosse v Simpson, 173 AD3d 856, 857).
In light of our determination, we need not reach the father's remaining contention.
SCHEINKMAN, P.J., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and WOOTEN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2020 NY Slip Op 05207, 129 N.Y.S.3d 812, 186 A.D.3d 1685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-ferone-v-magnussen-nyappdiv-2020.