Matter of DiMaio v. DiMaio

141 A.D.3d 520, 33 N.Y.S.3d 908
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 6, 2016
Docket2015-06185
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 141 A.D.3d 520 (Matter of DiMaio v. DiMaio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of DiMaio v. DiMaio, 141 A.D.3d 520, 33 N.Y.S.3d 908 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

— Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Connie Gonzalez, J.), dated June 9, 2015. The order, in effect, denied the mother’s objections to an order of that court (Sudeep Kaur, S.M.) dated August 29, 2014, which denied, without a hearing, the mother’s petition for an upward modification of the father’s child support obligation.

Ordered that the order dated June 9, 2015, is affirmed, with costs.

The mother filed a petition seeking an upward modification of the father’s child support obligation. In an order dated August 29, 2014, a Support Magistrate denied, without a hearing, the mother’s petition. In the order appealed from, the Family Court denied, as untimely, the mother’s objections to the Support Magistrate’s order. The mother appeals.

Objections to an order of a Support Magistrate must be filed within 35 days after the date on which the order is mailed to the objecting party (see Family Ct Act § 439 [e]; Matter of Kimelfeld v Menczelesz, 137 AD3d 914, 914-915 [2016]; Matter of Babb v Darnley, 123 AD3d 1028, 1029 [2014]; Matter of Heuser v Chavez, 117 AD3d 738, 738 [2014]). On this record, the Family Court properly denied the mother’s objections as untimely (see Matter of Kimelfeld v Menczelesz, 137 AD3d at 915; Matter of Yalvac v Williams, 131 AD3d 622 [2015]; Matter of Babb v Darnley, 123 AD3d at 1029).

*521 The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit.

Balkin, J.P., Roman, Cohen and Connolly, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Redd v. Burrell
2016 NY Slip Op 8365 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
141 A.D.3d 520, 33 N.Y.S.3d 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-dimaio-v-dimaio-nyappdiv-2016.