Matter of Dill v. Edwin B.

2025 NY Slip Op 03919
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 27, 2025
Docket475 CA 24-00965
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 03919 (Matter of Dill v. Edwin B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Dill v. Edwin B., 2025 NY Slip Op 03919 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Matter of Dill v Edwin B. (2025 NY Slip Op 03919)

Matter of Dill v Edwin B.
2025 NY Slip Op 03919
Decided on June 27, 2025
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 27, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CURRAN, J.P., BANNISTER, SMITH, DELCONTE, AND HANNAH, JJ.

475 CA 24-00965

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF DANIELLE DILL, PSY.D., EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL NEW YORK PSYCHIATRIC CENTER, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v

EDWIN B., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.


TODD G. MONAHAN, LITTLE FALLS, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

LETITIA JAMES, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (RACHEL RAIMONDI OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Charles C. Merrell, J.), entered June 5, 2024, in a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 33.03. The order, inter alia, authorized petitioner to administer medication to respondent over his objection.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order granting petitioner's application for authorization to administer medication to respondent over his objection. The order has since expired, rendering this appeal moot (see Matter of Blossom V. [Reddy], 230 AD3d 1552, 1552-1553 [4th Dept 2024]; Matter of Upstate Univ. Hosp. v Bryant W., 224 AD3d 1340, 1341 [4th Dept 2024]), and this case does not fall within the exception to the mootness doctrine (see Matter of McGrath, 245 AD2d 1081, 1082 [4th Dept 1997]; see generally Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]).

Entered: June 27, 2025

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Dill v. Edwin B.
2025 NY Slip Op 03919 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 03919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-dill-v-edwin-b-nyappdiv-2025.