MATTER OF CURLE v. Ward

46 N.Y.2d 1049
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 5, 1979·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, with costs to respondent, by providing that the declarations of unconstitutionality be stricken.

Examination of the record on respondent’s motion for sum[1051] mary judgment reveals that appellants have failed to tender sufficient evidence of the claimed detrimental impact of employee membership in the Ku Klux Klan (or even the perception thereof by inmates) upon the operation of correctional facilities to support the disciplinary action taken in this case. The only “evidence” submitted constitutes nothing more than speculation as to the effect which such membership might have upon the correctional facilities. In view of the meager and nearly barren state of the record, we do not address the broader constitutional issue raised by the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MATTER OF CURLE v. Ward, 46 N.Y.2d 1049 (N.Y. 1979).

46 N.Y.2d 1049 (MATTER OF CURLE v. Ward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walton v. New York State Department of Correctional Services
18 Misc. 3d 775 (New York Supreme Court, 2007)
Piscottano v. Murphy
317 F. Supp. 2d 97 (D. Connecticut, 2004)
Weicherding v. Riegel
981 F. Supp. 1143 (C.D. Illinois, 1997)
McClung v. Marion County Commission
360 S.E.2d 221 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1987)
McMullen v. Carson
568 F. Supp. 937 (M.D. Florida, 1983)
Morrisette v. Dilworth
89 A.D.2d 99 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Engblom v. Carey
522 F. Supp. 57 (S.D. New York, 1981)
MATTER OF CURLE v. Ward
46 N.Y.2d 1049 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)