Matter of Cosgrove (Walsh) (No. 2)

54 N.E.2d 34, 292 N.Y. 115, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 1404
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 20, 1944·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Cgriam.

The indorsements upon two envelopes of war voters in foreign service were not executed as required by the statute and the votes should have been rejected if objection had been made upon the original canvass (See Election Law, § 319). In the absence of objection the envelopes were opened as provided in the statute and the ballots deposited in the ballot box. We agree with the courts below that the ballots so deposited without objection must be .counted., Protest thereafter will not avail even where it may he possible to determine for which candidate such ballot was cast.

The order should be affirmed, without costs.

LehmaN, Ch. J., LoughraN, Rippey, Lewis, CoNWay, Des-moNd aiid Thaoher, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Cosgrove (Walsh) (No. 2), 54 N.E.2d 34, 292 N.Y. 115, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 1404 (N.Y. 1944).

54 N.E.2d 34 (Matter of Cosgrove (Walsh) (No. 2)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Incorporation of Village of Purchase
54 Misc. 2d 1049 (New York Supreme Court, 1967)
Progno v. Monroe County Election Commissioners
19 A.D.2d 462 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)
O'Shaughnessy v. Monroe County Board of Elections
15 A.D.2d 183 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
McGuinness v. DeSapio
9 A.D.2d 65 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Mullen v. Heffernan
193 Misc. 334 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)