MATTER OF CHMIELEWSKI v. City of New York
463 N.E.2d 1229, 61 N.Y.2d 1010, 475 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4230
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court óf Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that the Appellate Division abused its discretion in granting petitioner’s application to serve late notices of claim.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
MATTER OF CHMIELEWSKI v. City of New York, 463 N.E.2d 1229, 61 N.Y.2d 1010, 475 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4230 (N.Y. 1984).
463 N.E.2d 1229 (MATTER OF CHMIELEWSKI v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Valestil v. City of New York
295 A.D.2d 619 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Gruber v. City of New York
156 A.D.2d 450 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Delzotto v. County of Warren
137 A.D.2d 950 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)