MATTER OF CHMIELEWSKI v. City of New York

463 N.E.2d 1229, 61 N.Y.2d 1010, 475 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4230
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 29, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 463 N.E.2d 1229 (MATTER OF CHMIELEWSKI v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MATTER OF CHMIELEWSKI v. City of New York, 463 N.E.2d 1229, 61 N.Y.2d 1010, 475 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4230 (N.Y. 1984).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court óf Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that the Appellate Division abused its discretion in granting petitioner’s application to serve late notices of claim.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Valestil v. City of New York
295 A.D.2d 619 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Gruber v. City of New York
156 A.D.2d 450 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Delzotto v. County of Warren
137 A.D.2d 950 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
463 N.E.2d 1229, 61 N.Y.2d 1010, 475 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-chmielewski-v-city-of-new-york-ny-1984.