MATTER OF CHMIELEWSKI v. City of New York
This text of 463 N.E.2d 1229 (MATTER OF CHMIELEWSKI v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court óf Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that the Appellate Division abused its discretion in granting petitioner’s application to serve late notices of claim.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
463 N.E.2d 1229, 61 N.Y.2d 1010, 475 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-chmielewski-v-city-of-new-york-ny-1984.