Gruber v. City of New York

156 A.D.2d 450, 548 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15649
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 11, 1989
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 156 A.D.2d 450 (Gruber v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gruber v. City of New York, 156 A.D.2d 450, 548 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15649 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the petitioners appeal from a [451]*451judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), dated July 19,1988, which denied the application.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner Morton Gruber, an Assistant Principal at the August Martin High School in Jamaica, New York, tripped and fell while walking up a staircase located within the school. The accident occurred on June 1, 1987; however, no application for leave to serve a late notice of claim was made until on or about May 9, 1988. Concluding that the petitioners, Morton Gruber and his wife, had failed to demonstrate any valid excuse for the delay, the Supreme Court denied the application. We affirm.

Whether to grant the relief requested by the petitioner is a question committed to the sound discretion of the court (see generally, Matter of Chmielewski v City of New York, 61 NY2d 1010; cf, Zarrello v City of New York, 61 NY2d 628). The Supreme Court did not exercise its discretion in an improvident manner when it denied the petitioners’ application on the basis that no adequate excuse for the delay had been demonstrated (see generally, Matter of D Andrea v City of Glen Cove Pub. Schools, 143 AD2d 747; see also, Matter of Cali [County of Suffolk], 132 AD2d 555; Matter of Perry v City of New York, 133 AD2d 692; Matter of Salo v Board of Educ., 117 AD2d 922; Matter of Morgan v City of Elmira, 115 AD2d 885). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Valestil v. City of New York
295 A.D.2d 619 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Carty v. City of New York
228 A.D.2d 592 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Fok v. City of New York
224 A.D.2d 693 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Matarrese v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.
215 A.D.2d 7 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Plantin v. New York City Housing Authority
203 A.D.2d 579 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Purdy v. Afton Central School District
202 A.D.2d 776 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Townsend v. New York City Housing Authority
194 A.D.2d 795 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Farrell v. City of New York
191 A.D.2d 698 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Kyser v. New York City Housing Authority
178 A.D.2d 601 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Ortega v. New York City Housing Authority
167 A.D.2d 337 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 A.D.2d 450, 548 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gruber-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1989.